Legal Aspects of Health Care Administration Author: George D. Pozgar, Publisher: Jones & Bartlett Publishers, Edition: 14Read the case on page 110. Submit answers to the following questions. Was t 1

***** ******* ** ****** **** *************************** * ****** *************** ***** Bartlett Publishers ************** *** **** ** **** 110 ****** ******* to the following ************ the ******** the ******* **** ********** in *** *********** prosecution? In the **** ** Aetna **** ********* Company * ****** *** ******* ***** **** **** *** ********* evidence was *** ********** ** *** *********** *********** because *** patient was *** ********* ** testify *** ******* *** not ********* ** ******* ******* the ******* *** not of sound **** and *** *** **** to ********** *** ****** *** ************ ** *** or her testimony **** specifically the ******* *** *** **** ** ********** **** *** or *** testimony could be **** ** ******* *** defendant of * crime No *** ******** the ******* **** *** *** ********** ** *** *********** *********** *** ********* evidence was *** ********** ** *** *********** *********** because *** ******* *** not ********* ** ******* *** patient was *** ********* to ******* ******* *** ******* *** *** of ***** **** *** *** *** **** ** ********** *** ****** *** ************ ** *** ** her ********* **** specifically *** ******* was not able ** understand **** *** or her ********* ***** ** **** ** ******* the defendant ** * ******** patient’s ******** was not admissible ** *** *********** *********** ******* the patient *** *** ********* ** ******* *** ******* *** *** ********* ** ******* ******* *** ******* *** not ** ***** **** *** *** not **** to ********** *** nature and consequences ** his ** *** testimony **** ************ the ******* *** *** **** to ********** **** *** ** *** ********* ***** be **** ** ******* *** ********* ** a *********** *** ***** with *** ******* findings? ******* agree with the ******* ******** *** ******* *** *** ********* to testify ******* *** ******* *** *** ** ***** mind *** *** not **** to understand *** nature *** ************ ** *** ** her ********* **** ************ *** patient was *** **** ** ********** **** *** or her ********* ***** be **** to convict *** defendant ** * crime The ********* evidence *** *** ********** ** *** *********** *********** ******* *** ******* *** not ********* ** ******* *** patient was not ********* to ******* ******* *** ******* *** *** ** sound **** *** was not **** ** ********** the ****** *** ************ ** his ** *** ********* **** specifically *** ******* was *** **** to ********** that *** ** her testimony could ** used ** ******* *** ********* ** * ********** implications of **** case *** ****** care ************** are that **** **** ** be aware of the competency ** ***** ******** **** ** ***** ** testifying ** * *********** ** * ******* ** *** of sound **** ** is *** able to understand the ****** *** consequences ** his ** *** ********* **** the patient’s ******** **** *** be admissible in the *********** ***********