Read the following fictional “case.” An on-call ophthalmologist (eye specialist), without seeing the patient, diagnosed his eye pain associated with sensitivity to light and nausea, as sinusitis. In f

*************************************** NameInstitutionDue ******************** DiscussionWhat are *** ***** ** **** ******** **** ***** ***** the **** ******* the *** parties ********* *** *************** *** *** ******* *** *************** diagnosed * serious ********* ******** ** ******* ** the ******* losing ** *** ** *** *** acute ******* ******** rather **** *** *********** ** *** eye as earlier ******* ** *** *************** *** plaintiff *** experiencing *** **** *********** to ***** *** ****** *** ******* *************** diagnosed *** ********* ** ****** ********* when ** fact *** ********* had ***** ***** ******* ******** ** * ****** of the ************ *** ********* **** *** ***** ** the *** *** ********* * procedure to remove *** *** *** lawsuit settled for *********** *** * D’s present?The plaintiff was ********* with acute ***** closure ******** which ****** *** ** **** *** ***** ** *** *** This ** * ***** ******* ** ******* ********** ** the *************** *** *** ******** ******* *** ******* *** **** a ************ The *************** also *** *** provide *** proper treatment *** *** ********* ***** led ** *** permanent **** of the patient’s ******** four D’s *** ******* *** ***** D is ******** The ******* ***** ******** ** *** ********** ****** ** *** *** ** ******* *** **** ** her **** ******* *** ***** Deviance is ******* ** *** ophthalmologist **** ******* *** expectations of *** ******** ** ******** *** * sensitive ********* ******** *** **** ******* **** * patient is ******* and ********* ****** any conclusions and *************** *** **** **** *** hospital *** ******* is *** ************* ** *** cannot ******* *** ** *** ****** ****** **** ** ******* *** **** * is ************* ***** you ***** *** *** ********** The ******** *** the ********* ***** ***** ** *** code ** ******* ****** *** *** level ** incompetence the ****** ************ leading to complications **** led to the **** ** ***** *** plaintiff does not have *** ******* background ** understand *** ********** ** *** eye ******* Therefore *** *** *** ****** any *** ***** with *** ********* ******* *** plaintiff ***** ***** that *** *************** *** ********* ** ***** ********* *** treatment of the ********* which *** ** *** permanent **** of *** ********* ***** *** *************** did *** ******** ******* *** patient *** **** * ************ *** *************** **** *** *** ******* *** ****** ********* *** *** condition ***** led to the ********* loss ** the patient’s ******** ***** *** ***** for *** ************* *** ********* I would ***** that the ******* *** **** ***** ** ****** to ***** *** ******** ** ******* a ******** ********* ******* *** plaintiff did not have ********* *** *** costs ********** **** *** diagnosis were ****** Therefore the ****** had to utilize ********** *** utilize the ******** ********* by *** patient ** make a ***** ******** *** ophthalmologist *** *** *** *********** ** ***** diagnosis *** ********* of *** ******* *** ophthalmologist ******** *** ****** ******** in ********* *** patient and **** a diagnosis ***** ** *** ******** *** ******* was experiencing *** ophthalmologist then ******** the ****** treatment for *** ********* ***** was ************ ** ****** *** ********* ******* you were ** *** **** based on *** ***** ***** what ***** **** ******** be?If * was ** *** jury * ***** find the ****** ****** ** ********** *** ensure *** ******* **** justice for *** **** ** eyesight * ** jury ***** **** **** *** *************** *** ********* in their ********* *** ********* ** *** patient ***** *** ** *** permanent **** of *** ********* *****


Click here to download attached files:
TROITZ.docx